Dare Board: No new taxes; controversy on Hatteras Island

By on May 21, 2019

CRMP was denied a request for addional hours at its Waves plant to supply the Jughandle Bridge project.

Dare County residents should not see any tax increases in 2020 if the Board of Commissioners adopts the $168.8 million budget proposed by County Manager Bobby Outten at Monday night’s meeting.

Outten’s proposed budget includes $108 million for the 2019-2020 fiscal year’s General Fund and just under $68 million for other expenses, including $21 million for capital investments, $12.6 million in beach nourishment expenses, and $5.8 million for inlet maintenance.

Projected revenues match the budget’s proposed expenses, resulting in a balanced county budget as required by state law.

This budget marks the first year the capital investment budget has been separated from the general fund budget, necessitating some adjustments to compare the 2020 budget with the prior year.

After those adjustments, the new budget proposal represents a 1.95% increase in the General Fund budget and a 2.16% Total Budget increase.

The current county property tax rate will remain at 47 cents per $100 of assessed value. Dare County has the ninth lowest property tax rate among the state’s 100 counties. The average state property tax rate is 67.35 cents.

The next steps will include a budget workshop by the board, then a public hearing, currently scheduled for the June 3 meeting.

The board also approved a proposed $15 million loan agreement between Dare County and EJE Dredging Service and EJE Recycling Disposal to construct a dredge to be used primarily in Dare County waters. The $15 million is being provided by the State of North Carolina from allocations made in the state’s budget passed last year.

Two Hatteras Island issues consumed over three hours of the board’s meeting time.

The first was not an agenda item and concerned a controversial application for an oyster farming lease in the sound just offshore of the Wind Over Waves subdivision in the Hatteras Island village of Waves.

Hatteras Island resident Ryan Gentry has applied to the state’s Division of Marine Fisheries for an oyster bed lease 80 to 100 feet offshore of the Wind Over Waves subdivision. Gentry’s proposed oyster beds include using bags in shallow waters to breed the oysters.

Opponents of the application said the oyster bed would pose a hazard to long-standing pre-existing uses of the area by kiteboarders, windsurfers and jet ski users, among others.

At the May 7 board meeting opponents of the application asked the board to pass a resolution to be forwarded to the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries stating their opposition to the application.

Over a dozen people showed up to oppose an application for an oyster bed farm operation 80 to 100 feet off the shoreline near Wind Over Waves subdivision in Waves. (Russ Lay)

The resolution passed, but Chairman Bob Woodard said that after receiving more information from the applicant, including a request that he be allowed to address the board and the complaints of opponents, he asked NCDMF to set aside the Dare resolution until the May 21 board meeting to allow the board to consider any new information that might be presented.

That move prompted more than a dozen opponents of the application to speak at the public comment period, including two attorneys representing opponents residing in the Wind Over Waves subdivision, Jeff Malarney and Crouse Gray. Trip Foreman, co-founder of REAL Watersports in Waves and numerous other kiteboarding enthusiasts spoke against the application.

The board did not vote again on the issue so their prior resolution sent to NCDMF stands as is.

Commissioner Danny Couch, who represents Hatteras Island, expressed support for the applicant, stating he was casting a vote “for the people,” making reference to the local watermen who preceded the new developments on the island and were being squeezed out of their livelihood as conflicts arise between new and traditional uses of the waters surrounding Hatteras Island.

The most contentious part of the meeting came during a request by Commercial Ready Mix Products to amend a use permit governing the hours of operations of a temporary concrete plant in Waves. The plant supplies concrete for construction of the “jughandle” bridge that will run from the southern border of Pea lsland National Wildlife Refuge to the village of Rodanthe.

Edward Holmes, an engineer and senior project manager of the bridge project, spoke to the board to request the hours of operation for the concrete plant in Waves be expanded from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily to 3 a.m to 5 p.m. on “any three days of the week.”

Holmes, who works for Flatiron Construction company, said the request would allow Flatiron to build a long-lasting bridge by being able to pour concrete in the early morning hours, when cooler temperatures allow the concrete to cure more efficiently.

He held out the carrot that allowing the change might extend the time needed to resurface and repair the deck from 10 to 15 years to as far out as 20 to 30 years.

Holmes presented over 30 slides explaining the science behind the request. A noise expert presented findings showing the early morning operations would be no louder than normal street traffic on a “light” day.

Board members, particularly Woodward, repeatedly asked Holmes why the company bid on and signed a contract for the project knowing the approved hours for the plant without raising the issue of a higher quality bridge at the time.

Woodard was also frustrated by Holmes lack of possible alternatives, including moving the portable Waves plant closer to the job site, where there is far less residential and vacation rental activity as well as the use of other technologies to retard the curing time of the concrete, allowing for daytime pours, and bringing in an expert in a specialized technology used on the west coast in warm climate areas.

At one point the exchange between Woodard and Holmes became testy, with the chairman repeatedly asking the engineer, “Did you do your homework when you submitted the bid?” and exclaiming “You didn’t answer the question” several times as Holmes tried to explain why they were coming before the board at this late date.

Other board members were equally skeptical and expressed the hope some compromise could be met. Because it was a “quasi-judicial” hearing, Bobby Outten, who functions as the county manager and county attorney, warned the board it could not offer specific compromise suggestions at this meeting.

Once again, about a dozen speakers were then sworn in, many of whom spoke earlier concerning the oyster bed and expressed concerns about the noise affecting sleep patterns and having an adverse effect on tourism in nearby rental homes, campgrounds and REAL Watersports condos within earshot of the concrete plant.

The board voted unanimously to reject the CUP amendment but appeared to leave the door open to alternatives if CRMP were to bring them forward.

Recent posts in this category

Recent posts in this category


  • surf123

    The concrete plan change of hours is only 3 days per week and even if it only added 1 year to time before resurfacing it makes sense to allow it. The plus to this is the county is getting something (extra life on surface) for zero cost other than some truck noise which we already have. Anyone hear the trash trucks that have picked up at my house as early as 3am?

    Wednesday, May 22 @ 8:56 am
  • surf123

    Another question is whether or not there have been legitimate complaints about the trucks, which I seriously doubt. There will always be people who complain for the sake of complaining or because others or doing it even they have never seen (or in this case heard) the so-called problems.

    There is probably not a name for the effect that being on vacation has on people. They don’t notice or can overlook issues because they are on vacation. It’s a week and they are not working so all is good. I frequently have visitors tell me they want to live here and I tell them that like any community there are issues and viewing a community, neighborhood or house you want live through “vacation goggles” is not a good idea because they don’t see issues. I’m always amazed that some houses can even sell given proximity to the highway or neighbors who don’t maintain their property (e.g. junk cars and other stuff in yards) or adjacent to commercial operations). The lack of zoning exasperates the problem, but that is something you don’t want to figure out after you have already moved and are next to what will be a commercial operation. Overzealous real estate agents are part of the problem.

    The rental companies of houses located near the plant could help by noting the cement factory is operating to support the bridge construction that is needed in order to maintain access the island and that it is short-term. I know Real is directly across the street, but I seriously doubt it will have any effect on their business. As for tourists they will be back cement plant or not.

    Thursday, May 23 @ 8:51 am
  • LJR

    Please don’t pass a judgement until you have stood in our houses and listened to the plant making concrete.

    Thursday, May 23 @ 4:44 pm
  • Steve

    The real controversy is the outsiders coming here and taking the livelihood away from locals, taking their heritage, forcing them out. The people that come here these days are very different than the ‘salt of the earth’ type that have morals.

    Monday, May 27 @ 6:44 am