Dare County agrees to classify NRPO’s as resident property owners in future health emergencies

By on July 6, 2020

At a special morning meeting on July 6, the Dare County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a settlement in the case of Bailey v. Dare County that would, in future public health emergencies, classify non-resident property owners the same way as residents and allow them the same entry into the county.

In that lawsuit, brought in federal court, the plaintiffs said their Constitutional rights were violated when county officials initially denied non-resident property owners access to the county during the COVID-19 outbreak. In approving the settlement, Dare County also agreed to pay $16,500 in legal costs, and County Manager Bobby Outten told the commissioners that the settlement was not an admission of fault or liability on the part of the county.

The decision to restrict access to non-resident property owners was a controversial one that spawned fierce and often angry debates on social media and elsewhere.

In a Voice interview, Dare County Manager Bobby Outten stressed that the settlement only applies to public health emergencies as defined by the WHO and would not include hurricanes or other natural disasters.

“There was no point in carrying it further,” he said of the Bailey v. Dare County litigation. When asked why the county had decided to settle, Outten said that original modeling had suggested that the return of non-resident property owners during the pandemic would have overloaded the health care system here. He acknowledged that the modeling had proved to be inaccurate.

“In hindsight,” he added, “the number of people who would have returned as non-resident property owners would not have been significant” in terms of worsening the COVID-19 outbreak in the county.

Update: In a brief interview with the Voice, plaintiffs’ attorney Chuck Kitchen said his clients were happy with the settlement agreed to by the Dare County Board of Commissioners and, “We are happy that this reaffirms that the Constitution is still in effect, even during a pandemic.”

 

 

 



PUBLIC NOTICE

ADVERTISEMENT FOR RE-BID: Barnhill Contracting Company will receive sealed proposals for the Kill Devil Hills – EMS/Fire Facility (EMS-1) project on Wednesday, February 08, 2023 @ 2:00pm for the following packages:

BP 400 – Turnkey Masonry, BP 505 – Light Gauge Metal Trusses, BP 833 – Overhead Doors, BP 925 – Drywall/Framing, BP 2200 – Plumbing, BP 2300 – HVAC, BP 2600 – Electrical

Scopes of work may be added and/or deleted at the discretion of the Construction Manager.

Bid Location and Time: Bid opening will be held in the Barnhill Contracting Rocky Mount Main Conference Room: 800 Tiffany Bvld, Rocky Mount, NC 27804. Time is as follows: Wednesday, February 08, 2023 at 2:00pm.

Barnhill Contracting Company will receive, open, and read publicly all bids received in person in the training room and listed with the virtual viewing at the link to be posted on Barnhill’s Plan Room.

Bids will not be accepted from bidders that are not pre-qualified. No facsimile or email submissions are permitted. Sealed bids are to be hand delivered to the bid opening location noted above or mailed Sealed Bids can be delivered before 9:00am the day of the bid to the Barnhill Contracting Company Office at 800 Tiffany Blvd., Suite 200 Rocky Mount, NC 27804. Attention “Clint Hardison.”

Bid Documents can be viewed or downloaded through Barnhill’s online Building Division Plan Room (https://app.buildingconnected.com/public/54da832ce3edb5050017438b).

All Bidders are strongly encouraged to include opportunities for HUB participation wherever possible in their respective Bid submission.  HUB participation is a part of this contract and must comply with all requirements set forth in the Bid Documents.

The Construction Manager and Owner reserve the right to add pre-qualified bidders. The Construction Manager and Owner reserve the right to reject any and all bids. Should you require additional direction, please call Barnhill Contracting Company, (Clint Hardison – 252-802-0740).

Clint Hardison is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Dare County – Kill Devil Hills EMS #01 / FS #14 – 2 PM Re-Bid Opening

Time: Feb 8, 2023 02:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting

https://barnhillcontracting.zoom.us/j/87409918806

Meeting ID: 874 0991 8806

One tap mobile

+16465189805,,87409918806# US (New York)

+17866351003,,87409918806# US (Miami)

Dial by your location

+1 646 518 9805 US (New York)

+1 786 635 1003 US (Miami)

+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)

+1 470 250 9358 US (Atlanta)

+1 213 338 8477 US (Los Angeles)

+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)

Meeting ID: 874 0991 8806

Find your local number: https://barnhillcontracting.zoom.us/u/kdFYJh0K85

Join by SIP

87409918806@zoomcrc.com

Join by H.323

162.255.37.11 (US West)

162.255.36.11 (US East)

Meeting ID: 874 0991 8806


 



Comments

  • Trashcan Man

    Q: So, why are NRPO’s treated differently from residents after a hurricane?
    A: To protect others’ health and safety.

    Meaning: Dare county settled because it was the most efficient way to deal with a selfish lawsuit. Period.
    NRPO’s cannot vote in Dare County. But we residents can and do!

    Thursday, Jul 9 @ 4:25 pm
  • Suresh Mangal

    For the period non resident restricted access should not charge the property taxes for that period and all owner should file new claim to get refund or credit for the property taxes

    Thursday, Jul 9 @ 5:27 pm
  • TC

    The entire discussion is so sad … Dare re-opened to all to support tourism with disregard to families who choose to spend their time and money in Dare by owning properties. Like it or not, this community consists of folks who live here all year and some more seasonally but either property owners and taxpayers.

    Thursday, Jul 9 @ 8:20 pm
  • hightider

    To respond to the whiny NRPO who is demanding his property taxes be refunded for the entire 6 weeks he was “denied” access to his (second) home – I pro-rated your 6 weeks of taxes as $500, more or less. You pay taxes for the months you are not here anyway. So the real question is did you plan to stay in your second home during the six weeks you were banned? If you did not plan a visit, then your taxes would have been irrelevant. However, if you did plan to come at that time, you were doing so to leave one of the hottest virus areas in NJ – Ocean County. Do you think a paltry $500 in pro-rated tax gives you the right to leave a heavily infected area and come here?

    Friday, Jul 10 @ 5:58 am
  • kkit

    Hightider: It doesn’t matter whether he planned to stay in his property or not… Taxes are a responsibility of ownership and go to pay for securing one’s property in the form of police and fire services, for example, at all times. Property owners don’t get exemptions from taxes while not in residence; they look silly when they claim to deserve them. They become laughably selfish fools who want what they want when they want it, even if it endangers all those around them.

    Saturday, Jul 11 @ 10:42 am
  • hightider

    Kkit – I evidently was unclear. The point I was making is he deserves no rebate on the 6 weeks he was “denied” his rights as a proprety owner. The taxes are due regardless of whether he comes here or not. In fact, if this were not the case, all NRPO could plead they should only have to pay property tax for the months they reside here! This guy wants to be reimbursed for 6 weeks of property tax. My comment is 1) you pay property tax whether you ar here or not; 2) did you even plan to come here during those 6 weeks, and 3) if you did plan to come here, you were coming from one of the most infected areas in the US and with one of the highest mortality rates. The Dare tax office shows he resides in Ocean County NJ. He is a whiner who is looking to scrounge some petty change from Dare County and not embarrassed to appear so brazenly self-serving.

    Sunday, Jul 12 @ 5:11 pm
  • OBX D

    Fun facts , county manager is the county lawyer and practicing real estate lawyer and the second highest payed county manger in state . So how or why does this man get to make any decisions for county citizens. Can we say conflict of interest

    Tuesday, Jul 14 @ 2:39 pm