Overall, Nags Head fares well in town survey  

By on November 2, 2023

Over-occupancy of vacation rentals and lack of affordable quality housing seen as problems

Presenting the results of the Town of Nags Head 2023 Community Survey at the Nov. 1 Nags Head Board of Commissioners meeting, Town Manager Andy Garman summed up the results this way: “We’re not perfect, but overall the responses are favorable.”

The survey was mailed to 3,000 randomly selected residents and homeowners starting in July 2023. It provided the opportunity for respondents to “rate the quality of quality of life in the Town of Nags Head as well as the quality of service delivery and overall performance of local government,” according to the language in the executive summary of the survey.

In total, 1,074 surveys were completed, yielding a solid response rate of 36%. In addition, a link to an online open-participation survey was publicized by the Town through various channels. A total of 62 open participation surveys were completed. Garman told the Nags Head Commissioners that the survey questionnaire contained close to 60 questions.

Here are some of the interesting findings from the results.
  • The town got very solid grades on some key questions. In all, 90% of the respondents rated the quality of services provided by Nags Head as either excellent (30%) or good (60%). In addition, a combined 86% rated the ease of access to Nags Head services as either excellent (29%) or good (57%). Only slightly fewer (82%) were positive about the overall direction the town is moving in—divided between 20% who said the direction was excellent and the 62% who characterized it as good.
  • The results were still positive but more mixed when respondents were asked to rate the overall value they receive in town services and programs for the taxes, charges and fees they pay. About six in ten (62%) rated that value as excellent (15%) or good (47%). A little less than four-in-ten (38%) graded that value as fair (31%) or poor (7%).
  • Respondents were also asked to assess both the importance of certain functions and priorities in the preservation and enhancement of Nags Head as well as evaluate how well the town has performed that function. The smallest gap between the two ratings came on the issue of providing public beach access—with 90% saying that it was important and 89% saying the town had been successful at it—as well as providing sidewalks and paths (85% said it was important and 84% rated it successful.) The largest gap was pretty conspicuous. Fully 93% of the respondents rated regulating development and controlling density as an important function. But only about half (51%) said the town had been successful at it.
  • Asked to identify which issues are a problem in Nags Head, one issue stood out. Four out of five respondents, (80%) said over-occupancy of vacation rentals was a problem, with 40% strongly agreeing with that and 40% somewhat agreeing. Coming in second on the list of problem issues was residential light spillover/glare onto adjacent properties, with a total of two-thirds of the respondents (67%) either strongly agreeing (27%) or somewhat agreeing (40%).
  • Addressing safety problems in Nags, the top problem, according to the survey results, is traffic speeding, with 65% identifying it as either a major problem (27%) or a moderate problem (38%). Right behind was drugs, with 63% seeing it as either a major problem (28%) or a minor problem (35%). The safety problem of least concern is violent crime, with only one-in-ten respondents (10%) identifying it as either a major or moderate problem.
  • Those who took the survey were asked to evaluate the status of building issues and housing options in Nags Head. Between roughly half and three-quarters of them expressed positive assessments about the physical condition of residential buildings in the town, the physical condition of commercial buildings and the variety of housing options. What gets the lowest rating, by far, is the availability of affordable quality housing. Only about one-in five (19%) offered positive assessments on that issue—with 4% saying excellent and 15% saying good.

To view the full survey report see Microsoft Word – 2023 NAGS HEAD SURVEY -JULY 19 (nagsheadnc.gov)


BIDDER PRE-QUALIFICATION REQUEST:

Barnhill Building Group has been selected as the Construction Manager @ Risk by the College of the Albemarle and is seeking to pre-qualify construction trade contractors to submit bids for the furnishing labor, materials, equipment, and tools for the new College of The Albemarle – Allied Health Sciences Simulation Lab (COA Health Sciences) located in Elizabeth City, NC. Please note: Only subcontractors who have been prequalified by Barnhill will be able to submit a Bid.

The project consists of the new construction of a 38,000-sf, 2-story expansion to the existing Owens Health Sciences Center and will house classrooms, labs, and a simulation lab. The site is just over just over 4.5 acres and is located on an active campus. This new construction will be a steel structure with a brick and metal panel veneer, curtainwall, and storefront glazing with a PVC roof membrane.

Principal trade and specialty contractors are solicited for the following Bid Packages:

BP0100: General Trades

BP0105: Final Cleaning

BP0390: Turnkey Concrete

BP0400: Turnkey Masonry

BP0500: Structural Steel & Misc. Steel

BP0740: Roofing

BP0750: Metal Panels

BP0790: Caulking / Caulking

BP0800: Turnkey Doors/Frames/Hardware

BP0840: Glass & Glazing

BP0925: Drywall

BP0960: Resilient Flooring

BP0980: Acoustical Ceilings

BP0990: Painting & Wallcovering

BP1005: Toilet Specialties / Accessories / Division 10

BP1010: Signage

BP1098: Demountable Partitions

BP1230: Finish Carpentry and Casework

BP1250: Window Treatment

BP1400: Elevators

BP2100: Fire Protection

BP2200: Plumbing

BP2300: HVAC

BP2600: Turnkey Electrical

BP3100: Turnkey Sitework

BP3290: Landscaping

Packages may be added and/or deleted at the discretion of the Construction Manager. Historically underutilized business firms are encouraged to complete participation submittals.

HUB/MWBE OUTREACH MEETING: Barnhill Building Group will be conducting a HUB/MWBE Informational Session. You are encouraged to attend the following session to learn more about project participation opportunities available to you. These seminars will help to: Learn about project and scope; Inform and train Minority/HUB contractors in preparation for bidding this project; Assist in registration on the State of North Carolina Vendor link; Stimulate opportunities for Networking with other firms. Location and time TBD. Please visit our planroom at https://app.buildingconnected.com/public/54da832ce3edb5050017438b for more information.

Interested contractors should submit their completed prequalification submittals, by July 22, 2024, to Meredith Terrell at mterrell@barnhillcontracting.com or hardcopies can be mailed to Barnhill Contracting Company PO Box 31765 Raleigh, NC 27622 (4325 Pleasant Valley Road, NC 27612).


 



Comments

  • Travis

    When your residents list “speeding” as their top public safety concern and “violent crime” of the least concern…you’re living in a pretty decent area, methinks.

    Thursday, Nov 2 @ 4:01 pm
  • surf123

    The over-occupancy issue will never be resolved. The rental companies dance to the tune of renters, not the homeowners who are just a pesky cog in the rental companies income wheel. There is no way they will risk offending a renter.

    Thursday, Nov 2 @ 6:02 pm
  • Ed

    Quality affordable housing is scarce everywhere. Hopefully our leadership can get scammed out of millions of our dollars by shady developers pretending to fix it.

    Thursday, Nov 2 @ 6:44 pm
  • Part Time OBX

    Quality affordable housing can be found on the main land. There is a ton of open space and affordable property values for all the housing they want to build. Manteo, and all the coastal towns and villages are no place for Government Subsidized (Section 8) housing.

    As for Over-Occupancy – more/bigger does not mean better. Return these coastal towns to the quant little seaside villages they were meant to be. If renters want over population, they can go back to Ocean City and Myrtle Beach. Vacationers that wanted a place that was quieter and more relaxing started coming here – stop building it up to be those other places!

    Friday, Nov 3 @ 9:53 am